What to consider when selecting a focus area:
-
- Government policies and objectives about the issue
- The current state of the issue in the country/ region/ area of interest
- What is considered by experts to be “best practice” regarding the issue?
- What are the key constraints and opportunities within the sector?
- Who are the other funders interested in supporting the issue and what are they doing?
- Who are the key civil society actors/ NGOs in the sector? What are they saying and doing?
Pro-active vs Reactive Donor
Proactive Grant-Making |
- Philanthropist will seek out the projects she wishes to support.
- This can be done by building on the research already undertaken, tapping into networks or making a public call for proposals.
- The pro-active grant-maker is usually an “interventionist” grant-maker that explicitly constructs (or co-constructs with partners) the outcomes she wishes to see as well as the path to those outcomes.
- So the call for proposals will set out the rationale for the programmes, the objectives it hopes to achieve, the deliverables it expects the donee/ partner organisation to meet and the criteria for being eligible to apply.
|
Reactive Grant-Making |
- Donor may also have clear strategies and eligibility criteria but she relies on organisations finding her and assessing whether they match her criteria for funding.
- If the philanthropist is new and just setting up, it is likely that she will be pro-active until her trust of foundation becomes better known in the circles she funds.
|
Most philanthropists are both, with an emphasis on one or the other